This article appeared in June 2012 Australasian Coin and Banknote Magazine written by the team at the Australian Coin Collecting Blog and is reproduced here for your viewing pleasure.

Figure 1: New Zealand 50c straight clip error with strong Blakesley Effect.

One of the most common Australian pre-decimal errors that you’ll find is the clipped planchet error. Also known as the incomplete planchet error, these coins are the product of a problem with the coin blank manufacturing process. During this process coin blanks are manufactured by a press known as a blanking press. A strip of metal is fed through the blanking press at high speed and the press utilises a gang of punches to strike the coin blanks out of the metal strip. The resultant products are of course the coin blanks and a length of metal strip (known as scissel) with holes punched out of it. The scissel is then re-melted to be rolled again to be fed through the blanking presses.

In an ideal world the striking rate of the blanking press matches the feed speed of the metal strip perfectly and one set of coin blanks is struck immediately after the last set so that the number of blanks produced is maximised. However, due to feed problems or speed variations sometimes a set of blanks is punched out before the holes from the preceding set has fully passed. The result of this is blanks being created with some metal missing. These blanks go on to be struck and are recognised as curved clipped planchet errors. In some other cases the metal strip can vary unexpectedly in width or blanks are punched from the very end of the strip of metal. This can result in other incomplete blanks that are known as straight or ragged edged clipped planchet errors. They are also sometimes called “end of bar” errors. Figure 1 illustrates how incomplete coin blanks might be formed from the metal strip with the incomplete blanks shaded grey. There are some other types of clipped planchet errors but these will be covered in a subsequent article.

Figure 2: How incomplete blanks might be formed.

The Blakesley Effect
Named after the American numismatist that first identified it, the Blakesley Effect can be the most powerful identifier of a genuine clipped planchet error. The effect is characterised by rim weakness directly opposite the missing portion of a clipped planchet error coin. This effect is a result of the rimming process that is used on most coin blanks to form a coin planchet. The rimming process rolls the coin blank along its edge under high pressure between a roller and a fixed edge, as it is rolled around the full circumference the edge is raised. When an incomplete blank rolls around this edging press the pressure is relieved when the missing portion contacts either the fixed edge or the rimming roller. The result is that no rim is formed opposite the missing portion of the coin blank.

When an incomplete coin planchet is struck the missing raised rim opposite the clipped region is typically very weakly struck simply because the rim is not raised. An excellent example of the Blakesley Effect is shown in Figure 2. It is important to realise that the Blakesley Effect will only be seen on coins that have been through the coin rimming process.

Figure 3: Fishtailing of USTR

Fishtailing and Radial Metal Flow
As a coin planchet is struck the metal flow will take the path of least resistance which normally is to fill the design elements of the coin dies. However, in the case of a clipped planchet the metal around the missing region will tend to flow outwards (or radially) towards the missing region. This is because the metal in this area is not restrained by the collar die. This radial metal flow shows itself in a couple of different ways. The first is fishtailing of the radial design elements (usually the legends) around the missing portion of the planchet. The second is rounding of the struck coin rim next to the missing portion of the planchet. Figure 3 shows a portion of a clipped Australian half penny with clear fishtailing of the letters USTR while Figure 4 exhibits clear rounding of the rim near the clipped portion of a 1964 penny.

Figure 4: Rounded rim edge

Strike Weakness
Because of the radial metal flow described above there is less metal to fill the die design elements around the missing part of the coin planchet. A genuine clipped planchet tends to have a weaker strike immediately around the missing part of the coin. Strike weakness due to a genuine clipped planchet error can be seen in Figure 5.

Figure 5:Strike weakness of + ELIZ

Conclusions
When the diagnostics of a genuine clipped planchet error coin are realised and understood it’s a fairly simple matter to determine if a coin is a genuine or manufactured “error”. Once one has enough practice it’s even possible to recognise genuine errors from poor images on the internet. If you are an error collector it’s an important set of skills to have in your “kit bag” and can prevent you from making mistakes, even when purchasing the most humble of error coins, the clipped planchet error.

References:
Jon Saxton, “The ‘clipped planchet’ error” (2004) Retrieved April 21, 2012 from http://www.triton.vg/clip.html
“How to Determine a Genuine Clipped Coin Error” (2009) Retrieved April 22, 2012 from https://www.australian-coins.com/blog/2009/09/how-to-determine-a-genuine-clipped-coin-error.html
Herbert, Alan (2002) “Official Price Guide to Mint Errors”, 6th Edition”, New York, House of Collectibles

1976 50 Cent Error PCGS MS64

This indent coin error has occurred when the previously struck 50c failed to exit the press cleanly and was jammed against the new blank when it was struck. This has left the impression and incuse (brockage) imprint of the coin that didn’t make it off the press. We’ve seen this before on Australian pre-decimal coins and we’ve come across what is such a superb example that we’d like to share it with our readers. The penny in our previous entry linked to above is the exact same type of error and the same malfunction in the press has occurred. When comparing the 2 examples you can clearly see the factors which make this coin a genuine mint error and not some kind of manufactured in the “back shed” variety. The fact that the reverse design is so well struck and remains undamaged tells us that the coin was pressed against the die when the indent happened. If it were post mint damage then we would certainly see intrusion or flattening of the design on this coin’s reverse -which there is not.

Click image to enlarge

1952a Penny Indent with Partial Brockage

This 1952a Australian penny was struck in Perth but there was a press malfunction during it’s minting. The coin struck prior to this coin had not exited the press completely before the new blank fell into place and was struck.This resulted in an Indent error in the new coin in the shape of the coin that had not exited the press fully. You can see by the shape and size of the indent that the new penny was only just caught up in the minting of the second coin. We can tell the coin that didn’t escape quickly enough was a struck penny as you can see a partial brockage imprint of it (more clearly) in the close-up below. You can see incuse denticles and the NY of penny in the indent space – this is the partial brockage. Sometimes you can get indent errors that have been indented with unstruck or blank coins and the indent space shows no design.

If this were a manufactured “in the back shed” error or post mint damage then you would see obliteration on the reverse of the penny behind where the indent occured which is not the case in this genuine mint error coin. It’s a lovely choice uncirculated example.

We’ve spoken before about indent errors and they can have many forms. This is probably the more common (but still rare), more so that the one in our first entry Australian Indent Errors that was a $1 indented with a blank 5c (a whole different denomination) when 2 blanks had been fed into the press simultaneously, which is very rare.

Closeup of the Indent Showing Partial Brockage